Work
Paul Kraus’s chapter on artificial generation, homunculi and animated statues across Greek and Arabic traditions. Translated and edited by Ben Gaskin, this edition includes Kraus’s complete 272-note apparatus, relevant additions and errata, translator’s notes, and English translations of Greek and Latin quotations.
What is learning for a single cell? The talk develops an account of learning through changes in sender–receiver signalling systems, using E. coli chemotaxis as a concrete case. It examines continuity between habituation, sensitisation and association, distinguishes coincidence detection from sensitivity to contingency, and extends the discussion to learning in individual neurons.
Can a soft body of identical contractile cells produce edge-sensitive behaviour without assigned sensor or motor roles? Selected synthetic specimens learn to approach an edge, distinguish a cliff from a goal, and reverse when needed. Performance is strong on the terrain family used in evolution but transfers only partially to new distances and body shapes; one specimen, S4, suggests a distinct morphology-dependent strategy.
What makes a molecular distinction informational in a living system? The talk treats biological information as organised molecular difference within evolved sender–receiver systems. Rate–distortion identifies which distinctions must persist and with what fidelity, while physical chemistry constrains how long they can survive and how they can be reset. Bacterial chemotaxis supplies a concrete case through CheY-P signalling and MCP methylation.
How do the image schemas of containment and many-sidedness organise different forms of inference? Aristotle’s logic treats predication as containment; Jain anekāntavāda qualifies claims by standpoint through nayavāda and syādvāda. The comparison does not rank the systems: container logic favours objective precision, while many-sidedness accommodates vagueness by accepting perspectival limits. Its application to wave–particle duality remains suggestive rather than settled.
How can Ellul’s concept of Technique be both unified and internally diverse? The proposed metaphysics of inscription concerns the material practice and mindset of working through texts, images, codes, maps, and drawings. Inscriptions decontextualise, immobilise, flatten, and organise aspects of actuality into a manipulable virtual reality, while encouraging an allocentric “view from nowhere.” This ordering mode helps explain Technique’s automatism, self-augmentation, monism, and universalism, although the dissertation explicitly stops short of claiming that Technique and inscription are identical.
Use Up and Down to browse. Right Arrow moves to links. Escape releases a kept-open preview.